Schools and Covid vaccinations - the legal landscape
The Government has decided that healthy 12 – 15 year olds can receive the Covid-19 vaccine and this autumn the first dose is being offered as part of the school based vaccination programme.
The beginning of a new academic year can be challenging for many but 2021 has added an additional burden on to schools in respect of the on-going debate about how best to manage the Covid Virus.
The Government has decided that healthy 12 – 15 year olds can receive the Covid-19 vaccine and this autumn the first dose is being offered as part of the school based vaccination programme. This has led to a polarisation of very strongly held views which has rather caught schools in the middle seeking to represent a responsible and reasonable position.
The issue of liability
We have seen many letters and representations written to schools, directed at the school as a corporate entity and to individual headteachers and CEO’s as personal leaders. Some of these letters come from individual parents, some come from concerned members of the public, either individually or more usually as a group and some are part of organised groups.
The letters generally take two forms; a letter setting out the reasons why the vaccine should not be used and highlighting the health risks to the students within the school. They purport to be the voice of those parents otherwise unable to speak for themselves. These generally do not require a reply or acknowledgement. Then there are those entitled ‘Cease and Desist’ letters and demand that you stop doing what you are doing to promote and administer vaccines. A short acknowledgement is advised for these. What they have in common is the threat the school should not be administering vaccines and to do so will incur personal liability for any unfortunate consequences of any resulting reaction to it by the children.
These letters are threatening and intimidating, and it is easy to see how teachers would feel nervous about their part in the programme. But there is the key, which the authors of these letters seem to have missed. Schools do not administer vaccines. They are administered by SAIS (School Age Immunisation Service). Nor, as some parents seem to think, do schools make assessments of which children should have the vaccine.
Where a child wants to have the vaccine against the wishes of their parents a competency assessment is made – the Gillick competency test. The child has to be assessed to have an understanding of the decision they are making and also an understanding of the consequences of that decision. This assessment is made by the SAIS, not the school. So, the school does not give the vaccines or make any contribution to the assessment of competency where parental consent is not forthcoming. It is difficult therefore to see how there is any rationale for trying to apply liability to the school. Some parents may argue that the simple fact of opening its doors as a centre is implicitly supporting the programme. Many schools are used as polling stations, but it is a big leap to hold a school responsible for the colour of the MP that is returned there.
A position of neutrality
Where a school needs to be careful in the vaccine/ no vaccine debate is the language it uses to the students about the choices they are making. It is sensible to make literature available to students and to refer them to organisations that can give them more information, but it is important that the school remains neutral and makes it clear that this is a matter for individual choice. They need to be careful that there is no opportunity for peer pressure or bullying between the students and to ensure that there is an openness and balance to any comments that are made. Where demonstrations or similar take place outside the school, do not try and stop it unless parents are being intimidated or you feel it is getting out of hand. In this instance call upon the local police force who may send out a PCSO or officer to keep an eye on things and make sure that they do not escalate.
Schools should take comfort that they do not carry any risk of incurring liability as long as they do not interfere with the process of the professionals who are on the front line and who have been tasked with the process of administering vaccines to those that want it.
This article was first published by SecEd
Contact

Julia Green
Partner
julia.green@brownejacobson.com
+44 (0)330 045 2796
You may be interested in...
Online Event
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Legal Update
be connected - Spring 2023
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Legal Update
New support launched to manage school complaints
Legal Update
Cyber security and data breaches
Legal Update
#EdCon2023 virtual event hailed a success
Online Event
Flexible working in schools webinar
Legal Update
What does the new Provider Access Legislation mean for schools?
Legal Update
High Court dismisses Welsh RSE right to withdraw claim
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
On-Demand
Industrial action essentials: what you need to know
Legal Update
Education Software Solutions Limited breaks against the CMA’s intervention: A victory for freedom and flexibility in contracting for MIS services
Legal Update
Safeguarding at scale report published
Legal Update
Trade unions announce plans to re-ballot members
Legal Update
Widespread industrial action now confirmed for schools
Legal Update
Industrial action and minimum service levels within education
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Guide
FAQs - converting to academy status
Guide
FAQs - becoming a sponsored academy
Guide
FAQs - becoming an academy sponsor
Guide
FAQs – single academy joining a MAT
Legal Update
EdCon2023 launch: Thursday 12 January
Legal Update
The importance of understanding the transitional provisions under the Electronic Communications Code
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
Legal Update
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update
Protecting children and their data in the online environment
Guide
#EdCon2023: Access a range of expert guidance and resources at our FREE virtual conference
Legal Update
be prepared for the 2022-23 academic year
Legal Update
Teacher Pay Survey 2022
Legal Update
The Schools Bill – law no more
In July, we published an update on the Schools Bill with the news that the proposed legislation relating to new academy standards and extended intervention powers for academy trusts would be removed. Last week, we received broader news of the dropping of the Bill, with education secretary Gillian Keegan announcing that it will not reach its third reading in the House of Lords.Legal Update
be connected newsletter for schools - Winter 2022
Guide
Recruiting school staff on a budget – top tips
Regardless of the outcome of ballots on industrial action, unless there is drastic change to funding for schools in relation to pay increases, it will be unusual to find any organisational budget that is not impacted by the current economic situation.
Guide
Good governance essential to avoid falling foul of the ESFA
There’s been little evidence of interventions or financial management reviews this year and it appears the Education and Skills Funding Agency (ESFA) has re-focussed on financial delivery. It’s also telling that there were no discernible changes to the reporting of financial irregularities in the Academies Trust Handbook 2022.
Legal Update
Children's commissioner recommendations for SEND reform
The Children’s Commissioner, Rachel De Souza, has recently published a report “Beyond the labels: a SEND system which works for every child, every time”, which she intends to sit alongside the DfE’s SEND Review (2019) and SEND Green Paper (2022) and which she hopes will put children’s voices at the heart of the government’s review of SEND system.
Legal Update
Top three training topics 2022-23
As well as providing day-to-day support to help you focus on managing your settings, we also provide training and professional development on a range of topics to keep you and your staff up-to-date.
Legal Update
Hair discrimination – stop pupils being unfairly singled-out for their appearance
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHCR) recently issued new, non-statutory guidance regarding the wearing of natural or protective hairstyles, specifically in reference to their representation in uniform, behaviour or standalone appearance policies.
Opinion
The role of benchmarking in setting pay in schools
Emma Hughes, head of HR services at Browne Jacobson, explains how CST’s updated executive pay report and the linked benchmarking service from XpertHR can help trust boards make robust decisions on pay.
Legal Update
School complaint management - exploring a new way forward
There’s greater opportunity than ever for parents, carers and guardians to voice any concerns they have relating to their child’s education and for their concerns to be heard and to be taken seriously. While most staff in schools and academies are conscious of their legal duties relating to complaints management, many are struggling to cope with such a significant increase in the volume of complaints they must manage.