
Improving the performance of the NSIP planning process and supporting local authorities
Policy Statement
Boosting local growth and improving infrastructure are key policy goals within the now familiar Government “Levelling Up” agenda. The Levelling-up and Regeneration Bill, when enacted, aims to ensure faster delivery of such infrastructure projects, through amendments regarding the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects (NSIP) Development Consent Orders (DCO) system.
NSIPs are major infrastructure developments which, due to their size and national importance, bypass the normal local planning requirements. Rather than applying to the local authority for planning permission, the developer must apply to the Planning Inspectorate for a DCO. The NSIP planning system was created under the Planning Act 2008, establishing statutory timescales and a streamlined DCO process for major infrastructure projects. The system, which came into force in 2010, has considered 113 transport, energy, and wastewater projects – significantly speeding up the planning process between submitting an application and a DCO being granted. In the National Infrastructure Strategy (2020) (NIS) the government committed to an NSIP Reform Programme, aiming to speed up timescales by up to 50% for some projects entering the system from September 2023.
The amendments to the Bill, when enacted, will enable:
Fast track consenting
The amended Bill will allow for fast-track consenting – a power which will considerably shorten the statutory timeframe for a DCO examination by the relevant department. Already, in the British Energy Security Strategy, the Government has committed to a range of measures to reduce consent times for Offshore Wind Projects from up to four years down to only one. After consultation later this year on quality criteria, underlying regulations and guidance changes, the specific details of the policy are likely to become clearer.
Faster post-consent changes
The Bill will grant the Secretary of State power to set secondary legislation relating to the decision-making process associated with Non-Material Change applications. This will enable faster post-consent changes. The current complexity of making changes to DCOs has been a longstanding problem for developers. At present, changes to consents which are deemed non-material can take up to 16 months to be determined and sometimes cause significant delays to delivery. This legislation will enable Government to develop and pilot an improved, faster approach, including bringing in statutory timeframes if necessary.
Charging Developers for expert input
The Bill will establish powers so that Government agencies which provide technical expert advice on DCO applications will be able to charge developers for their NSIP services, across the statutory and non-statutory parts of the process. Capacity issues in key statutory agencies can create delay. The Government intends to consult on its approach to implementing charging frameworks later this year. This amendment will be published for consideration at Commons Report stage of the Bill.
Innovation and Capacity building for Local Authorities affected by NSIPs
The Levelling-Up White Paper recognises the need for the inclusion of local leaders having the power and accountabilities to design and deliver effective policies for driving infrastructure projects. In the NSIP Policy Statement, local authorities, representing the needs and views of local people, are identified as being at the frontline of delivering local impact reports, working with developers and ensuring plans are integrated with local infrastructure. An attempt to realise this and further empower them has been made via funding through a competitive tender process of 10 projects in local authorities which are expected to be particularly affected by applications for major transport, energy and water schemes over the next year.
Summary
Until the draft amendment is published, and the consultation takes place, the exact nuts and bolts of the changes to the regime will be unclear. At this stage, the proposals appear to be paving the way for a more efficient regime, particularly with regard to fast tracking post-consent changes – where delays have previously hindered delivery. However, at this stage the proposals remain high level. Once fleshed out, developers and stakeholders alike should have a better idea of what sort of applications will qualify for the expediated DCO procedure.
This article was co-authored by Adam Sutherland, a trainee on secondment from Government’s Legal Department and Laura Hughes.
You may be interested in...
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
Guide
Devolution: a catalyst for long-term, positive change in local communities
Press Release
Law firm Browne Jacobson appointed to work alongside the Government Legal Department - the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
In Person Event
Navigating your way through high profile sensitive reviews and investigations
Legal Update
Public matters - February 2023
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain — Government publishes consultation response
Opinion
‘Awaab’s Law’- a significant amendment to the Social Housing Regulation Bill
Legal Update
Embargoed Judgments: A Professional Word of Caution
Legal Update
Procurement Bill debarment regime and ECHR issues
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Guide
Public procurement: key facts and compliance considerations
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s real estate specialists advise Chesterfield Borough Council on prestigious new development - One Waterside Place
Opinion
Will fixed recoverable costs in housing conditions claims see the light of day?
Legal Update
J A Ball Limited (in Administration) v St Philips Homes (Courthaulds) Ltd
Online Event
Register to join our Academy: to Register your interest in our next Academy
Legal Update
Government introduces first Streamlined Subsidy Schemes under new regime
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise High Peak Borough Council on future high street funded acquisition as part of Buxton regeneration vision
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Legal Update
Public matters - January 2023
Published Article
What are freeports and what benefits could they offer?
Legal Update
Dangerous Dogs
Published Article
Reaching Cloud Nine?
Legal Update
Unlawful delegation of decision-making powers
On-Demand
The Subsidy Control Act 2022. Putting the new regime into practice
Published Article
How the Environment Act affects existing contracts’
Guide
2023: Horizon scanning in construction
Legal Update
Biodiversity Net Gain: positive for nature and an opportunity for landowners
Opinion
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Legal Update
Public matters - December 2022
Legal Update
Updated Greening Government Commitments 2021 – 2025 published
Opinion
Is over centralisation hindering economic growth?
Legal Update
Protecting children and their data in the online environment
Press Release
Browne Jacobson helps launch new innovative council company network with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School
Law firm Browne Jacobson has collaborated with Wiltshire Council and Christ Church Business School on the launch event of The Council Company Best Practice and Innovation Network, a platform which brings together academic experts and senior local authority leaders, allowing them to share best practice in relation to council companies.
Legal Update
Public Matters - November 2022
Legal Update
Dipping in and out of the Investment Zones
Announced in September but scrapped on 17 November the investment zone proposals were very short lived. The proposal has now morphed into the proposal for a smaller number of clustered zones earmarked for investment.
Legal Update
Hillside – the end of drop in applications?
On 2 November 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the much awaiting case of Hillside Parks Ltd v Snowdonia National Park Authority [2022] UKSC 30. The Court’s judgment suggests that the long established practice of using drop-in applications is in fact much more restricted than previously thought. This judgment therefore has significant implications for both the developers and local planning authorities.
Published Article
Local authority duties: Up in the air
In ‘failure to remove’ claims, the claimant alleges abuse in the family home and asserts that the local authority should have known about the abuse and/or that they should have removed the claimant from the family home and into care earlier.