Recent changes to HMRC's policy on VAT and contract termination payments
On 2 September HMRC announced a change in its policy on the VAT treatment of compensation and damages payments in the context of early contract termination.
On 2 September HMRC announced a change in its policy on the VAT treatment of compensation and damages payments in the context of early contract termination1. It’s an important change to note for anyone making or about to make these types of payments coming out of a contract termination or dispute. The HMRC announcement was low on detail as to how this will be applied to various practical situations. It’s to be hoped that HMRC will provide further guidance in due course, but in the meantime some headline points to note are as follows.
Background
Until this recent HMRC revision, payments that were purely compensation or damages could often be treated as outside the scope of VAT, although the VAT treatment of compensation and damages payments generally has not always been an exact science, as it’s largely drawn from case law and HMRC’s ongoing interpretation of that.
The change
As of 2 September, HMRC have changed their view on the VAT treatment of payments arising out of early contract termination. Following a couple of European cases (Meo (C-295/17) and Vodafone Portugal (C-43/19)), HMRC are now saying that most early contract termination and cancellation fees will be within the scope of VAT, and that this will be the case even if the payments are described as compensation or damages.
In its announcement on 2 September HMRC said: “HMRC guidance on charges described as compensation or early termination fees in a contract, have been changed to make it clear that they are generally liable for VAT.” In its updated guidance, HMRC go on to say “it is only where there is no direct link between a payment and a supply of goods or services that it may be outside the scope of VAT."2
Some specific points or questions coming out of this general policy step change from HMRC include the following:
Liquidated damages
While previously HMRC’s guidance had suggested that liquidated damages were outside the scope of VAT, their view has changed. They are now saying that although liquidated damages payments are designed to compensate, they are made as a result of events envisaged under the contract, and so are consideration for what’s provided under the contract. That would mean they will often be subject to VAT.
Rate of VAT
This needs clarifying by HMRC. If we accept that a compensation payment for early contract termination may now be within the scope of VAT, is that automatically standard rated or does it follow the VAT treatment applied to the supplies provided in the underlying contract, which might for example be VAT exempt or zero rated rather than standard rated? From HMRC’s wording so far on this, it seems the latter is more likely, namely that the VAT rate applied to the supplies made in the underlying contract would also apply to the compensation payment. But it’s not crystal clear.
Is it retrospective?
Again not explicit in the HMRC guidance, there’s a risk from how HMRC’s revised VAT treatment has been phrased that it could be applied retrospectively over the last 4 years. That would be out of kilter with HMRC’s usual approach on changes to tax policy, where you’d often find a forward looking change and some transitional arrangements. So further clarification from HMRC would be welcome.
This is not a blanket change to the VAT treatment of any and all compensation or damages payments, but could impact a wide range of contract terminations and disputes.
If you would like further details on this, please contact Andrew Noble.
1Revenue and Customs Brief 12/20 at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/revenue-and-customs-brief-12-2020-vat-early-termination-fees-and-compensation-payments/revenue-and-customs-brief-12-2020-vat-early-termination-fees-and-compensation-payments
2Extract from section 05910, HMRC VAT Supply and Consideration Manual
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Published Article
Why are we waiting?
In Person Event
In-house lawyer's launch event
On-Demand
NSIA: the thorn in the side of M&A?
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Press Release
Browne Jacobson dealmakers advise B Corp certified Edit Agency on its investment into data insight agency Wood for Trees
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has approval to take over from the Solicitors Indemnity Fund
Legal Update
Embargoed Judgments: A Professional Word of Caution
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s intellectual property lawyers ranked experts in World Trademark Review guide 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advise on disposal of Sella Controls to HIMA Group
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s dealmakers advise leading door hardware supplier and manufacturer UAP on its acquisition of Maher London
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Legal Update
Public matters - January 2023
Published Article
What are freeports and what benefits could they offer?
Guide
FAQs - converting to academy status
Opinion
Litigation in 2023 – Reforms on the horizon
Press Release
Browne Jacobson dealmakers announce completion of over 130 deals worth billions in value in 2022 and eye up healthy pipeline for 2023
Legal Update
Banking Transaction Updates - January 2023
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises Superscript on £45m Series B funding round to transform its SME insurtech offering
Legal Update
MEES: Are you ready for April 2023?
With only a few months left until the next phase of changes in the application of the Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES), it is important for both landlords and tenants of commercial property in England and Wales to review their property portfolios.
Press Release
Manchester dealmakers advise Maven Capital Partners on £1m investment in fintech disruptor Nivo Solutions
Published Article
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - EV charging points: contractual and liability issues to be aware of
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - Grant Funding and Collaboration Agreements
In this session, we examined the legal framework around grant funded collaborations and discussed the key risks to be aware of, including IP ownership and compliance with grant terms.
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - Commercial Contracts
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises LDC on investment in water and environmental sustainability specialist Stonbury
Press Release
Browne Jacobson advises sustainable waste solution provider Covanta Europe on its new Wellingborough based aggregate processing plant
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
From associate to partner in an investment lifecycle - Ryan's story
Press Release - #BeingBrowneJacobson
Browne Jacobson helps the Civil Aviation Authority take off with its modernisation masterplan
Press Release
Bishopsgate and Browne Jacobson advise on US firm’s acquisition of Notts based tech services business Custard
Bishopsgate Corporate Finance and law firm Browne Jacobson have jointly advised on the acquisition of award-winning tech solutions business, Custard Technical Services by US managers services and cyber security provider, Thrive.
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s retail lawyers advise Wilko on its strategic £48m sale and leaseback of Nottinghamshire distribution centre to DHL
National law firm Browne Jacobson has advised long standing retail client, Wilko on the sale and leaseback of its Nottinghamshire distribution centre in Worksop to logistics specialist DHL for £48m.
Press Release
Court of Appeal makes plea for legally enforceable arbitration for FRAND disputes
In the ongoing complex litigation between Optis Cellular Technology LLC and Apple Inc., the Court of Appeal ([2022] EWCA Civ 1411) has upheld the High Court’s findings that implementers of standard-essential patents (SEPs) cannot refuse to accept a FRAND license and continue activities in the meantime which constitute infringement: that party must commit to accept a court-determined license if it wishes to avoid an injunction.
Legal Update
Beauty Industry - Plastic Packaging Tax
The war on plastic is being taken to a new level, and businesses that don’t consider sourcing recycled packaging materials could face costly implications.
Legal Update
Five “takeaways” in claims against mortgage brokers following Taylor v Legal & General Partnership Services Ltd [2022] EWHC 2475 (Ch)
Claims arising from interest-only mortgages have been farmed in volume. Many such claims to date have sought to drive a narrative that interest-only mortgages are an inherently toxic product and brokers were negligent simply for suggesting them. Taylor is a helpful recalibration, focussing instead on what the monies raised by the mortgage product were being used for and whether the client understood the inherent risks.
Opinion
The Future of Mediation
Press Release
Browne Jacobson announces former Aston Martin Vice President as Non-Executive Director of its Manufacturing & Industrials sector
Law firm Browne Jacobson has appointed former Vice President and Chief Planning Officer (CPO) of Aston Martin Lagonda, Nikki Rimmington as its first Non-Executive Director (NED) of its Manufacturing & Industrials sector strategy board.
Legal Update
Trigger happy when directors’ duties are the target?
In a judgment handed down yesterday the Supreme Court has affirmed that a so called “creditor duty” exists for directors such that in some circumstances company directors are required to act in accordance with, or to consider the interests of creditors. Those circumstances potentially arise when a company is insolvent or where there is a “probability” of an insolvency. We explore below the “trigger” for such a test to apply and its implications.
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
Legal Update
Failure to comply with PD57AC — it can be costly!
Practice Direction 57AC (“PD57AC”) relates to witness evidence in trials and explicitly applies only to the Business and Property Courts. It applies to existing proceedings in which the witness statements for trial are signed on or after 6 April 2021.