Status and Substitution
In Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine, the Court of Appeal was asked to consider the principles governing when the ability to appoint a substitute negated the obligation to personally perform work.
In Stuart Delivery Ltd v Augustine, the Court of Appeal was asked to consider the principles governing when the ability to appoint a substitute negated the obligation to personally perform work. Once the Claimant had signed up for a delivery time slot, if he decided that he no longer wished to work that slot, he could release it and any other courier who had a contract with the Respondent and who had signed up to the Respondent’s app could agree to take up the slot. Any courier taking up the slot would not be known to the Claimant, and the Claimant was unable to put forwards anyone specific to pick up the slot. The Respondent sought to argue that the right to substitute meant that the Claimant was not obliged to perform personally any work or services, and as a result, was not a worker within the meaning of section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
Rather unsurprisingly (given the decision of the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court in Pimlico Plumbers v Smith), the Court of Appeal disagreed with the Respondent. The factual situation in Pimlico Plumbers was broadly analogous in that the substitute had to come from the ranks of Pimlico operatives. The limited right here to release the slot in the hope that another courier would pick it up was not a sufficient right of substitution which removed the Claimant from the obligation to perform his work personally for the Respondent.
The Court of Appeal stressed that its judgment was not to say that there was necessarily a “rule” that a right or ability to appoint a substitute from a pool of operatives would always be inconsistent with an obligation of personal service – however, such a conclusion reached by an employment tribunal is one which has been accepted as being a reasonable conclusion.
The Court of Appeal also stressed that it was not necessary for a tribunal to attempt to “fit” particular cases into one of the five categories (or principles) included by the Court of Appeal in Pimlico Plumbers – such an exercise was artificial. Instead, the focus should simply be on whether there is any fetter on the right to substitute and, if so, whether the nature and degree of that fetter is inconsistent with an obligation of personal performance.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Online Event
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
In Person Event
Navigating your way through high profile sensitive reviews and investigations
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s Manchester dealmakers advise Spatial Global on its acquisition of Heathrow based freight specialist Hollyport Logistics
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Legal Update
Government publishes its proposals for expanding the Scope of the Network and Information Systems Regulations 2018
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Supreme court rules on retail tenant's service charge bill
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
Legal Update
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Published Article
Consumer duty part 3 - 'The drill-down' into the 'cross-cutting' rules
On-Demand
Automotive webinar - EV charging points: contractual and liability issues to be aware of
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Legal Update
Official statistics demonstrate a new wave of age discrimination claims
Opinion
Menopause and the NHS workforce addressing the female brain drain…
Opinion
4-day working week a success?
The Covid-19 pandemic drastically changed the world’s way of working, with increased flexibility being greatly desired by employees. Earlier on in the year, a number of organisations trialled the concept of a 4-day working week – which has clearly been a success for many.Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Published Article
Starling Bank employment tribunal
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
Published Article
EU banks show slow progress on gender diversity
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
Opinion
Rising wages ahead
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Opinion
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Press Release
Browne Jacobson’s retail lawyers advise Wilko on its strategic £48m sale and leaseback of Nottinghamshire distribution centre to DHL
National law firm Browne Jacobson has advised long standing retail client, Wilko on the sale and leaseback of its Nottinghamshire distribution centre in Worksop to logistics specialist DHL for £48m.
Press Release
Suzanne Harlow joins Browne Jacobson as Non-Executive Director
Law firm Browne Jacobson is pleased to announce that Suzanne Harlow has been appointed Non-Executive Director of its Retail, Consumer & Logistics sector.
Legal Update
Is this the end for free returns?
Earlier in the year a number of fashion retailers, boldly announced the introduction of a charging fee for returning any product purchased via their online store. Yet, despite this commercial, and perhaps somewhat controversial decision, at least one major fashion giant that adopted this approach has recorded ‘historic highs’ in its September profits. Browne Jacobson partner, Cat Driscoll who heads up the firm’s commercial team in Manchester and is also head of its Fashion & Beauty sector discusses whether this change has put the average consumer off and whether the days of free returns are long gone.