EU has published a redacted version of its contract with UK drug maker AstraZeneca to procure the Covid-19 vaccine
The EU has published a redacted version of its contract with UK drug maker AstraZeneca to procure the Covid-19 vaccine.
The EU has published a redacted version of its contract with UK drug maker AstraZeneca to procure the Covid-19 vaccine. Some initial thoughts from us.
Firstly – this is subject to Belgian law; what follows is our view as English lawyers. English law and Belgian law are different.
Secondly, a note on definitions.
‘Best reasonable efforts’ is often a drafting compromise. One party wants best efforts; another wants reasonable efforts. A compromise could be ‘best reasonable efforts’ – or ‘reasonable best efforts’. None of these amount to an outright obligation.
However, here, “Best Reasonable Efforts” is a defined term. The meaning of the phrase is found not in the phrase on its own but in the definition. That definition does not actually talk about “best reasonable efforts”. Best Reasonable Efforts is defined to mean the activity and effort that a company like AstraZeneca would use. This is quite different to the wording in Curevac/EU vaccine contract – there the definition of reasonable best efforts starts “a reasonable degree of best effort to accomplish a given task”. The definition in the AstraZeneca contract does not import these concepts. (And it is certainly not an outright obligation to do something).
“Initial Europe Doses” is the first tranche of 300m doses for member states. Some of the details about delivery timelines have been redacted.
Thirdly, the operative clauses.
Clause 5.1 says that AstraZeneca shall use “Best Reasonable Efforts” to manufacture the “Initial Europe Doses” within the EU to distribution hubs within a redacted timeline. Here, the reference is just to manufacture in the EU.
Clause 5.4 says that AstraZeneca has to use “Best Reasonable Efforts” to manufacture the Vaccine within the EU and the UK; that clause itself doesn’t oblige AstraZeneca to supply any given amount.
A literal reading is that (5.4) AstraZeneca has to use the degree of effort that a company like AstraZeneca would use to manufacture in both the EU and the UK; and (5.1) has to use the same level of effort to manufacture the Initial Europe Doses within the EU. The contract doesn’t say explicitly that AstraZeneca has to use efforts to manufacture the Initial Europe Doses in the UK.
But, it can be argued that a company the size of AstraZeneca with production facilities across the world should be using its efforts to plug significant shortfalls in Europe in a reasonable way.
Some commentators have pointed out that clause 6.2 deals with capacity limitations, but this clause is irrelevant to the UK/EU issue. 6.2 only deals with a conflict between separate agreements entered into by the commission.
The EU has said that clause 13.1(e) is important. In this, AstraZeneca says that it is not under an obligation to anyone else (like the UK) “in respect of the Initial Europe Doses” or that conflicts with the agreement. We expect that AstraZeneca will say that this was true when the contract was signed, and that it has since made Best Reasonable Efforts; but vaccine manufacture is not guaranteed in the timescales available.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion - Maternity services
University Hospital Leicester hold their inaugural Maternity Safety Conference
In Person Event
Navigating your way through high profile sensitive reviews and investigations
Opinion
Junior doctors vote unanimously in favour of strike action
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time
Press Release - Careers
Browne Jacobson health lawyer wins major accolade at Made in Manchester Awards
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
Legal Update
Green Leases for the NHS
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Published Article
The first 100 days for Integrated Care Boards
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
On-Demand
Future of Care - Retirement Living webinar
In Person Event
Independent Healthcare In-House Lawyers Forum
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Press Release - Maternity services
Father Christmas comes to University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire care of Browne Jacobson’s Birmingham Office Community Action Group
Opinion - Maternity services
The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and its impact on maternity services
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Article
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Opinion
Consultation launched on plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce
Legal Update
Getting ready to face Industrial Action
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Published Article
How AI and technology can transform the healthcare sector
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
On-Demand
Insights from the Chief Coroner by His Honour Judge Thomas Teague, KC
Opinion
BMA advises consultants not to accept less than the BMA minimum rate card for extra-contractual work
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.
On-Demand
Leadership and lessons learnt during the Pandemic by Professor Jonathan Van-Tam
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework
Guide - Maternity services
Mediation guide for Clinicians: What do you need to know and how do you need to prepare
Opinion
NHS England – Updated Transaction Guidance
NHS England has published (October 2022) new guidance - Assuring and supporting complex change: Statutory transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.
Opinion
NHS England – Assuring and supporting complex change
NHS England has issued an updated (publication 11 October 2022) suite of Complex Change guidance about how it will assure and support proposals for complex change that are reportable to it. New and (where it is still in force) existing Complex Change guidance are as follows.
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
Legal Update
Economic crime and cybercrime
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Legal Update
Redundancy consultation and selection concerning expiry of a fixed term contract – EAT put the spotlight onto a ‘selection pool of one’
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.