All change? Nationality & Borders Bill
Whilst the Bill still has to clear the House of Lords, there is a great concern over the impact of the Bill.
The Nationality and Borders Bill was announced in the House of Commons on 6 July 2021 and has been introduced following the government's New Plan for Immigration.
From 6 December 2021, the Nationality and Borders Bill returned to the House of Commons to be scrutinised and it will return to the House of Lords on 5 January 2022.
This legislation is described as the governments ‘new plan for immigration’. However, the bill has been heavily criticized as controversial. It makes changes to the UK Immigration System relating to asylum seekers and refugees by differentiating based on method of arrival, as well as looks to alter the current system for asylum claims and appeals and countering people smuggling and modern slavery.
The Home Secretary announced that the new plan will aim to:
- increase the fairness and efficacy of the system so that the UK can better protect and support those in genuine need of asylum;
- deter illegal entry into the UK, thereby breaking the business model of criminal trafficking networks and protecting the lives of those they endanger; and
- remove more easily from the UK those with no right to be here
However, the Bill contains several measures which are, or are likely to:
- arguably be incompatible with international law
- potentially damage access to justice, and
- impact on the role of lawyers in immigration cases
Some of the key elements are:
- There is a provision which allows the UK to be able to send asylum seekers to a ‘safe third country’ to submit claims at a place determined by the Secretary of State. It is believed the Bill gives potential to allow offshore processing centres to be set up overseas akin to policies used in Australia.
- The Bill gives Border Force powers to turn migrants away from the UK while at sea and makes it a criminal offence to knowingly arrived on the UK without permissions
- The maximum sentence for those entering the country unlawfully will rise from 6 months imprisonment to 4 years.
- There are changes to appeals processes, including removing stages of appeal or fast-tracking certain cases.
- It contains a plan to strip people of British Citizenship without notice. The existing law already allows deprivation of citizenship where people pose a threat to the UK including terrorism, fraudulent citizenship or war crimes. However, the amendment to the clause removes the right to do this without notification.
The powers the Bill gives are excessively broad and has been scrutinised to represent a troubling level of government overreach at the expense of individuals liberty and risks justice, and the rule of law.
Whilst the Bill still has to clear the House of Lords, there is a great concern over the impact of the Bill. As an example, the deprivation of citizenship clause.
Discussing this provision in the Commons on 7 December 2021, it was pointed out that individuals outside the UK are given 28 days to appeal the deprivation of their citizenship, and asked the government to clarify whether this deadline would be extended for those who had not been notified within the 28-day window.
Speaking for the government, a Home Office secretary insisted that the right of appeal would remain intact. MP’s are urging greater awareness of the detail of the legislation before the House of Lords begin their examination of it. It is a question of watch this space for more information as we discover more detail when the Bill reaches the House of Lords stage early next year.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion
Mopping up after a leak – how businesses can take steps to protect their confidential information
Legal Update
UK Government publishes the Online Safety Bill: an overview
Online Event
Wellbeing and financial considerations – practical solutions for challenging times
Press Release
Browne Jacobson collaborates with The GLAA and University of Nottingham to tackle modern slavery and human trafficking
In Person Event
Navigating your way through high profile sensitive reviews and investigations
Legal Update
Teacher strikes – lessons learnt so far
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
On-Demand
Employment update webinar
Opinion
Term-time school worker entitled to national minimum wage for unworked basic hours
Opinion
Fire and re-hire – draft statutory code
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
Opinion
Consultation on holiday entitlement – part-year and irregular workers
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Opinion
Twitter facing employment claims following mass redundancies
News that Twitter is being threatened with multiple claims by UK employees following mass redundancies provides a reminder of the risks that comes with an employer implementing large scale redundancy exercises.
Legal Update
Industrial Action and Minimum Service Levels
Legal Update
Discrimination comes of age
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Rising Employment Tribunal backlog
Legal Update
Official statistics demonstrate a new wave of age discrimination claims
Opinion
Menopause and the NHS workforce addressing the female brain drain…
Opinion
4-day working week a success?
The Covid-19 pandemic drastically changed the world’s way of working, with increased flexibility being greatly desired by employees. Earlier on in the year, a number of organisations trialled the concept of a 4-day working week – which has clearly been a success for many.Legal Update
Coming of age
Official statistics show that 15,336 claims which included a complaint of age discrimination were received at the Employment Tribunals between March 2020 and March 2021.
Published Article
Starling Bank employment tribunal
The outcome of the Employment Tribunal claim brought by Gulnaz Raja against Starling Bank Limited (1) (Starling), and Matthew Newman (2) was reported last month.
Published Article
EU banks show slow progress on gender diversity
Opinion
Rising wages ahead
In the Autumn Statement delivered on 17 November, rises to the National Living Wage and National Minimum Wage rates were announced, to take effect from 1 April 2023.
Opinion
World Cup 2022 – how employers can avoid scoring an own goal!
The World Cup kicks off in Qatar on Sunday 20 November 2022, with the final taking place on Sunday 18 December 2022. Undoubtedly, this is a huge sporting event, and many employees will be keen to show their support for their favourite teams. However, due to the time difference, start times for the matches are between 10 a.m. and 7 p.m. UK time, which could have an impact on employers if employees who wish to watch the matches are scheduled to work.
Legal Update
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations?
Settlement agreements are commonplace in an employment context and are ordinarily used to provide the parties to the agreement with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship.
Opinion
The vanishing dismissal
Where an employee appeals against their dismissal under a contractual appeal procedure and their appeal is successful, reinstatement to their previous role is automatic and does not require approval or agreement from the employee.
Opinion
Settlement agreements – what are the limitations post Bathgate?
Settlement agreements in an employment context are ordinarily used to provide both parties with certainty following the conclusion of an employment relationship – but what happens when there is alleged discrimination after entering into a settlement agreement?
Legal Update
IR35 rules here to stay after government U-turn
A few weeks ago we brought you news that following the Government’s mini-budget it was confirmed that the off-payroll working rules (known as “IR35”) put in place for public and private sector businesses from 2017 and 2021 would be scrapped from April 2023.
Legal Update
Redundancy consultation and selection concerning expiry of a fixed term contract – EAT put the spotlight onto a ‘selection pool of one’
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.
Opinion
Lying on your CV – what can possibly go wrong?
The majority of people do not feel the need to embellish their CV to get that coveted position and move on up the career ladder. Their worthiness and benefit to the hiring organisation are easily demonstrated through the recruitment process – application, psychometric testing, selection day or interview.
Legal Update
Changes to holiday pay for part-year workers
In July 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its long-awaited Judgement in the case of Harpur Trust v Brazel relating to the correct calculation of statutory holiday pay for part year workers. This decision has implications for all part year workers on contracts which subsist all year round, whether their hours are normal or irregular.
Opinion
“Red tape” reform and no-fault dismissals
The Government has announced a change to the categorisation of “small” businesses to reduce the amount of regulatory compliance (or “red tape”) required. Currently, SMEs (those with fewer than 250 employees) are exempt from certain regulations – such as the obligation to comply with gender pay reporting. With effect from 3 October, these exemptions will be widened to apply to businesses with fewer than 500 employees.
Opinion
Internal reports and privilege
In University of Dundee v Chakraborty, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether a first draft of a grievance report could retrospectively be deemed to be privileged.