Clarification in Psychiatric Secondary Victim Claims: Proximity in “Omission” Cases
Charles Bagot QC and Browne Jacobson LLP, instructed by NHS Resolution on behalf of The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, secured the strike out of two secondary victim claims.
Charles Bagot QC and Browne Jacobson LLP, instructed by NHS Resolution on behalf of The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, secured the strike out of two secondary victim claims. The decision clarifies how the proximity test should be applied in clinical negligence cases where there is a time gap between a negligent omission and a subsequent shocking event.
Mr Paul was investigated by the Trust for chest pains in November 2012. He was subsequently discharged. Sadly, in January 2014, whilst out shopping with two of his children, he suffered a cardiac arrest. His collapse was witnessed by his children, who also observed paramedics attending the scene and performing chest compressions on their father. Mr Paul was conveyed to hospital by ambulance where it was felt that future resuscitation attempts would be futile and he was pronounced dead.
The key issue was whether the Trust could be held responsible for any psychiatric injuries suffered by the children as a consequence of witnessing the collapse. The children had not witnessed the events of Mr Paul’s November 2012 hospital admission.
The Claimants contended that Mr Paul’s collapse was the first appreciable manifestation of the Defendant’s alleged breach of duty and that this was sufficient to meet the proximity test. The Trust denied legal proximity between the alleged failures to treat Mr Paul in November 2012 and his subsequent collapse in January 2014.
Master Cook concluded that ‘To focus simply on the death of Mr Paul as being the first point at which the consequence of the Defendant’s negligence became apparent is not an approach which is supported by the authorities. To do so overlooks entirely that there must be a proximate connection between the initial negligence and the shocking event. It is this proximity in space and time that allowed Lord Oliver to impose the duty of care in Alcock and was described by Lord Dyson MR in Taylor v A Novo as “ a necessary, but not sufficient, condition of legal proximity” . It is this proximity which has been found to exist in all successful secondary victim claims including Walters and it is the lack of such proximity which explains why the claims in cases such as Taylor v Somerset Health Authority and Taylor v A Novo failed.”
“Mr Paul’s tragic death 14 ½ months after the negligent incident, in circumstances separated in space and time from the negligence I must assume occurred in the hospital, cannot possibly be said to be the “relevant event” for deciding the proximity required to establish liability under the established control mechanisms”. Master Cook concluded that the two secondary victim claims were bound to fail and the claims were struck out.
The decision re-affirms the approaches adopted in Taylor v Novo and Taylor v Somerset Health Authority and the requirement for the shocking ‘event’ in question to be proximate to the (alleged) negligence.
Related expertise
You may be interested in...
Opinion - Maternity services
University Hospital Leicester hold their inaugural Maternity Safety Conference
In Person Event
Navigating your way through high profile sensitive reviews and investigations
Opinion
Junior doctors vote unanimously in favour of strike action
Opinion
Can toilet facilities amount to sex discrimination?
Published Article
Digital Twin Technologies: key legal contractual considerations
Opinion
Consultation launched on minimum ambulance service levels during strike action
Opinion - Maternity services
Changes to redundancy protections for employees post-maternity leave
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Coroners’ Question Time
Press Release - Careers
Browne Jacobson health lawyer wins major accolade at Made in Manchester Awards
Opinion
BMA issues medical locum rate card for junior doctors
Legal Update
Employee who refused to wear a face mask fairly dismissed
Opinion
New toolkit to support safer recruitment in the care sector
Legal Update
Green Leases for the NHS
Guide
Government response to the consultation on the Higher-Risk Buildings Regulations
Published Article
The first 100 days for Integrated Care Boards
Opinion
Menopause and the workplace
On-Demand
Future of Care - Retirement Living webinar
In Person Event
Independent Healthcare In-House Lawyers Forum
Opinion
Government introduces new “anti-striking laws” to be discussed in Parliament
Press Release - Maternity services
Father Christmas comes to University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire care of Browne Jacobson’s Birmingham Office Community Action Group
Opinion - Maternity services
The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF) and its impact on maternity services
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Looking ahead to 2023 – what Health and Care employers need to know
Opinion
Coroner’s refusal to issue a Prevention of Future Deaths Report following death in prison custody inquest was lawful
Article
Mental health, eating disorders and placement of young people
Legal Update
LPS consultation and ‘go live’ planning
Opinion
Consultation launched on plans to amend NHS pension rules to bolster NHS workforce
Legal Update
Getting ready to face Industrial Action
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: Prolonged disorders of consciousness
Published Article
How AI and technology can transform the healthcare sector
On-Demand
The UK's green agenda - the outcomes of COP27 and actions since COP26
On-Demand
Insights from the Chief Coroner by His Honour Judge Thomas Teague, KC
Opinion
BMA advises consultants not to accept less than the BMA minimum rate card for extra-contractual work
The BMA is advising all NHS / HSCNI consultants to ensure extra-contractual work is paid at the BMA minimum recommended rate and to decline offers of extra-contractual work that doesn't value them appropriately.
On-Demand
Leadership and lessons learnt during the Pandemic by Professor Jonathan Van-Tam
Legal Update - Shared Insights
Shared Insights: The Patient Safety Incident Response Framework
Guide - Maternity services
Mediation guide for Clinicians: What do you need to know and how do you need to prepare
Opinion
NHS England – Updated Transaction Guidance
NHS England has published (October 2022) new guidance - Assuring and supporting complex change: Statutory transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.
Opinion
NHS England – Assuring and supporting complex change
NHS England has issued an updated (publication 11 October 2022) suite of Complex Change guidance about how it will assure and support proposals for complex change that are reportable to it. New and (where it is still in force) existing Complex Change guidance are as follows.
Legal Update
The Retained EU Law
Created at the end of the Brexit transition period, Retained EU Law is a category of domestic law that consists of EU-derived legislation retained in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018. This was never intended to be a permanent arrangement as parliament promised to deal with retained EU law through the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill (the “Bill”).
Legal Update
Economic crime and cybercrime
It is clear that the digital landscape, often termed cyberspace, is a man-made environment, in which human behaviour dominates and where technology both influences and aids our role in it — through the internet, telecoms and networked computer systems, which are often interdependent. The extent to which any organisation is potentially vulnerable to cyber-attack depends on how well these elements are aligned.
Legal Update
Redundancy consultation and selection concerning expiry of a fixed term contract – EAT put the spotlight onto a ‘selection pool of one’
In Mogane v Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether it was fair to dismiss a nurse as redundant on the basis that that her fixed-term contract was due to expire before that of her colleague.